AI is Now Ruining Children’s Cartoons

PLUS: The Secrets of "Longlegs"’s Scary Cinematography

Aloha Hollywood tech nerds!

In this week’s post:

Subscribe to get Hollywood Tech Nerds magically delivered to your inbox every Tuesday!

AI is Now Ruining Children’s Cartoons

A recurring theme I enjoy writing about is the constant promotion of bizarre AI “products,” essentially things that don’t sound appealing, have no use cases, or simply make no sense as described.

This week’s edition comes courtesy of The Hollywood Reporter, which published a piece on how AI-generated children’s content has so far turned out to be a big bust:

“The future of children’s entertainment is here, and we’re thrilled to be at the forefront of this revolution,” says Kartoon Studios chief executive Andy Heyward in a statement. President Todd Steinman stresses that AI provides “significant cost efficiencies and speed to market,” allowing the company to “expand our content initiatives and fuel our programming pipeline in a way that couldn’t have been possible before.”

The shows have failed to take off. Since last year, roughly 20 episodes have been released. They collectively have less than 40,000 views on YouTube and are among the least watched content on the company’s accounts.

Sounds bad! I wonder why this type of content isn’t exciting the youths??

In one, Warren Buffett’s Secret Millionaires Club — intended to teach kids financial literacy — a 3D animated Buffett is featured as a talking head speaking to the significance of mentors. Cartoon renderings of a piggy bank and a multigenerational family flash in the background, along with streaking brushes of color.

“So remember, the trick to life is knowing who to be the bat boy for,” the famed investor says as a stock image of a baseball player shoots across the screen. “This is important to understand if you want to be a home run hitter!”

Wow, a cartoon with beloved childhood staple Warren Buffett can’t get any traction. What has the world come to?

UPDATE: An eagle-eyed reader emailed me and it appears Warren Buffett’s Secret Millionaires Club is a show that has existed for a long time predating any AI boom, just that these new “Mini” episodes are likely AI-generated: https://www.kartoonchannel.com/shows/secret-millionaires-club/season/3/episode/1

The article also indicates some of the other reasons that such content is unappealing to studios, a large one being that so far AI-generated media is not copyrightable. What studio or streamer is going to waste money on something they can’t even keep as exclusive to themselves? Piracy is built in!

Unmentioned in the article but relevant is also the inherent danger of allowing AI to self-generate content for children. Internet oldheads may remember the infamous case of “Elsagate,” wherein bizarre, violent, and creepy Internet videos ostensibly for children flooded YouTube. Videos featured a pregnant Spider-Man or the Paw Patrol burning down a house! It seemed obvious to me the animated versions were machine-generated, the unavoidable endpoint of chasing views via uncurated content creation.

Do we want unsupervised computer programs generating the material our children end up watching? The self-evident answer is NO but here we are!

The Secrets of Longlegs’s Scary Cinematography

I know, I know: I’ve already written about Longlegs recently. I had to again because it’s just had its digital release and I remain astounded that a film made for under $10 million crossed the $100 million mark during its theatrical run. That’s seriously impressive! Maybe Hollywood should take a few notes.

Anyway, Filmmaker Magazine has a superb interview with Longlegs’s cinematographer Andrés Arochi with tons of fascinating info about the whys and hows of the film’s camerawork, as well as the amazing fact that this was Arochi’s first narrative feature film!

On mixing film and digital cinematography:

Originally, we wanted to shoot all the movie on film, but then we decided that we didn’t want to really focus on all those technical aspects during the shoot. We really wanted to work with the actors and focus more on the narrative side of filmmaking. But we did want to separate the 1970s [sections of the movie] from the 1990s. So, I decided to shoot 35mm for everything in the 1970s and go with a 4:3 aspect ratio, then we did 2.39 and shot on digital with the Alexa Mini LF for the 1990s.

…our film package was an homage to Harris Savides, who’s one of my favorite DPs—Oz [Perkins]’s too. We used Cooke S4s with an Arri 35mm camera for the flashbacks. Our main package for the 1990s was a Mini LF with Arri Signature Primes.

I also valued Arochi’s take on how to generate fear in a horror film:

Arochi: I always wanted to leave blank space in the frame because, for me, fear lives behind your back. It’s not in front of you. If you’re working on your computer at 1 a.m. and you feel something, it’s always behind you. So, it was this idea of always having space for fear to live.

Filmmaker: The approach that many horror movies take is to shoot tight and then the scare comes from something invading that space. To me, that’s not really scary. That’s just surprise. There’s a shot in Longlegs where Maika is working at her remote cabin home—as you said, with her back to the room—and there’s this incredibly wide field of view. It’s wider than what the peripheral vision of a human eye would see. There are all these dark corners in that room, and you just feel a presence there, even though nothing ever leaps out at us. That feeling of unease or dread is what I like in a horror movie more so than just the shock of a jump scare.

Arochi: That’s exactly it and that cabin was where I found that idea during the first week of shooting. That’s where we realized that she’s so exposed.

Here’s a round-up of cool and interesting links about Hollywood and technology:

The trademark fight over the viral TikTok trend “very mindful, very demure” heats up! (link)

Twisters makes a triumphant return to 4DX. (link)

How will Hollywood define AI standards? (link)